granata.enrico added a comment. Admittedly way simpler than my original idea. +1
Having the RTTI support so that these SBTypeSummary objects can actually be used for anything other than mere creation would be nice. However, I can fill that gap myself later. ================ Comment at: source/API/SBTypeSummary.cpp:157 @@ +156,3 @@ + SBStream stream; + if (!cb(valobj.GetSP(), &opt, stream)) + return false; ---------------- I assume you are essentially relying on the SBValue constructor that takes a ValueObjectSP here, right? And similarly for the SummaryOptions? ================ Comment at: source/API/SBTypeSummary.cpp:162 @@ +161,3 @@ + }, + "SBTypeSummary formatter callbacxk" + ) ---------------- Any reason not to let people submit their own name/description for the summary formatter here? http://reviews.llvm.org/D13657 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
