tfiala added a comment. > If it is proven we are doing something wrong for cross compiling, and > somebody wants to make that right, we then change over from using the > disutils approach both in generating the partial relative directory for > answering 'lldb -P' and in the finalization of python class swig generation > step.
The one piece I would totally be agreeable to changing and adding here for the sake of my statement above is to make the packaging of the lldb module call the exact same code rather than use the same underlying method. Right now they both use distutils, but through two different call sites. It would maybe make it easier to change this in the future if changing one place covered both of them. http://reviews.llvm.org/D13625 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
