-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02.10.2015 10:07, Ed Maste wrote: > On 1 October 2015 at 23:09, Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-commits > <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Yes, please! Better incomplete support in the source trees then >> once almost complete but rotting in a local patch... > > I agree - I think it's better to get basic support in as soon as > possible and we can refactor as appropriate in the tree. >
Right. There are just few pending patches to make it buildable and runnable: - - ncurses one (already in review D12995), - - platform code (pushed to review within D13334), - - cmake glue for platform code (it will come next), - - autotools glue for platform code (ditto), - - minor glue (swig, ...). When we will get the above in-trees I already have local patches to polish the things up. > Will you be able to get a NetBSD builder after the changes start > going in? I will try to ask for one. Two daily builds (one with CMake and the second one with autotools) should be good enough. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWDllBAAoJEEuzCOmwLnZsimAP/R86mUDXyvOjXWupMZBzQQTM NjvZZOBocm+cWWwesgByFc8B+GSxNSAJStlm+ooLt7/d88ajtE6TOtvuqE97ust7 /O1cVvjTMtSgMycosCc1bF/8BibPBV/LW+ce1JEj7FCXycfGIboK6W55CQhA6/++ DV0Qh3gAtdQjApLcrXVcu5PYvUpY783bIL1YL0vpecz+nLKtjfWjLjFuUUvP9FcB nS8DTsZ+d+j1Y9cQYXa6EUCsTUie/aRinOo6JO00LJ7AVgOTcGYyb1auCldaEXBK 4qRCR42vfe1w0NLRqWqj6tWlzM3iQnP7UFuUOb4+GXTdh5jOdTePOsAzPdRI48JW xNz51T1wFqzex0EQN9q+xb+D66wa7yDpM0DxL8xo4ry7ogz+tCvvn7A8uXjhaDWd gVoP31IcATlfTkmvqinP7WcA8JuUr25gVwBsx7GC9XmmNnsPg9QUJnQs+dhS+rHj NK/7KnRPQ1calP7E5iNq3omuhzLkmkIiCOnbYeGo81yk46DaexUG48LWiFU9PNu7 fwbcL572y07tqr2yCcbrSgpMq8Wf6rmMB7ObjZdsI21ZzogCIGW9WKyH86e/fc8l 4RYNMp9peFRNDqQbfCI9I9N7h+Gp9La1q/Kw0CbcjZ5ZTJJQdouYWWhGDFw0X+Od e1Tanif6uzC4VEAUwUva =giVS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
