On 24 September 2015 at 17:35, Siva Chandra <sivachan...@google.com> wrote: > > As blaikie pointed out on the review, it could be because libc++ (which is > the default on FreeBSD and Darwin?) does not have an explicit declaration > for std::basic_string<...>? I have now landed a change which removes the > dependence on std::string. Hope it fixes the test for FreeBSD and darwin.
Ah yes, I did not see that before replying. The test indeed now passes for me on FreeBSD. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
