tberghammer added a subscriber: tberghammer. tberghammer added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12899#248654, @ki.stfu wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12899#248648, @zturner wrote: > > > One possible solution is to make an lldb-all target. > > > As I said, it would much better rather than changing lldb dependencies. But > I'm still not sure, do we really need something like lldb-all? Why we can't > use "ninja" (i.e. without arguments) for building a whole LLDB? "ninja" without any argument builds everything including llvm, clang and a lot of related tools what increase the link time by a lot (assuming something changed in the llvm/clang repository since the last build). http://reviews.llvm.org/D12899 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
