Yep you're right, I just found this and verified it on Linux. I'll get that fixed ASAP.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 14 September 2015 at 12:25, Todd Fiala via lldb-commits > <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Author: tfiala > > Date: Mon Sep 14 11:25:34 2015 > > New Revision: 247576 > > > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=247576&view=rev > > Log: > > Cleaned up a few unexpected successes on OS X > > ... > > - @expectedFailureClang('13314878') # This test works with gcc, but > fails with newer version of clang on Linux due to a clang issue. Fails for > icc as well. Bug number TDB. > > + @expectedFailureAll(oslist=["linux"], compiler=["clang", "icc"]) > > I don't think the compiler can be a list (because it also allows for a > compiler version check) -- it needs to be split in two > expectedFailureAll AFAICT. > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
