dawn added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12115#243093, @abidh wrote:
> We dont use the lldb_private stuff inside lldb-mi. Please see the discussion > in the following thread. > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2015-March/007047.html Thank you for your review and for the link. I agree in general and have avoided lldb_private myself, but this means duplicated code which is arguably worse. I think it's time to make lldb-mi a proper part of lldb to avoid reinventing the wheel, or adding SB APIs that make no sense outside of lldb-mi. But I am sympathetic to both arguments so will revise. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D12115 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
