As allways started experimentig ideas... plain copy of the file: https://cvvergara.github.io/osgeonode/index.html It didn't catch the formats, but at least the data is there: https://cvvergara.github.io/osgeonode/index.html
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Vicky > > Brian and Cameron are correct to point out duplication. Indeed cameron > pointed out duplication when information sheets were being produced (sorry > cameron I under estimated the enthusiastic response, we had planned to only > print two information sheets!). > > Jeffrey Johnson (and Cameron?) have talked about writing down this kind of > information once and then generate the page for the osgeo website and for > osgeo live. That is a long term goal (as the osgeo live release schedule > and the website release schedule did not leave much room for close > collaboration in these summer months). > > The OSGeo website plans to list much more than just osgeo projects - since > the goal is to "empower everyone with open source geospatial" :) Just like > osgeo live, the foundation (and thus the website) has a mandate to promote. > > You can see one example here: http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/ > geo-node/ > > There is also a choose-a-project page taking shape that helps guide > visitors to open source software that meets there needs (irregardless of > where it was created from). This is important in areas like cloud > processing where OSGeo projects are not playing yet. > > > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 6 August 2017 at 15:44, Vicky Vergara <vi...@georepublic.de> wrote: > >> Hi all: >> Not complaining, but just some thoughts about this: >> >> > with the new OSGeo web site development.. somehow I realized that the >> docs from OSGeo-Live should be the same docs in the new OSGeo web site. >> >> By "docs" you mean the current "overview documentation" or both overview >> and quickstart documentation? >> I will suppose both for this points: >> - I must remind that a lot of projects in "OSGeo Live" are not >> OSGeo-projects or OSGeo-community related. >> - I don't think OSGeo would have overview and quickstart documentation >> of projects not OSGeo related >> - what about those not on OSGeo >> - What will happen to projects where the documentation and or wiki is >> stored actually outside of OSGeo website see: >> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo >> - The task would probably need a script that capture information from the >> OSGeo official site to put on the OSGeo Live documentation. >> - Who will be in charge of making sure that the documentation in OSGeo >> matches/has what OSGeo Live needs on. (aka, all the complains we do about >> "not following the standards for the overview page or the quick start page) >> - we also do translations, what about those?, how would be the official >> site for translating, do the script also captures translated pages from >> OSGeo site? what if they dont have them yet?. >> - If sphinx(or any other documentation generator) is still used for OSGeo >> Live documentation, a script (after capturing) might be needed to convert >> the OSGeo Page to sphinx(or any other documentation generator) structure? >> - who will make such a script? >> - who will verify the conversion is correct? >> - who will contact projects to change the OSGeo Page that has problems, >> so that they fix it? >> - The docs on OSGeo live have version related information. >> - After releasing OSGeo disk, the projects might change make new >> releases, so are updates based on changes on the OSGeo pages going to be >> reflected automatically to generate a new micro release of the disk because >> the project documentation changed on the OSGeo website? >> >> >> regards >> Vicky >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Cameron Shorter < >> cameron.shor...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Brian, >>> >>> You have eloquently presented the current state of OSGeo-Live and the >>> foundations for future opportunities and growth. >>> >>> I particularly agree with your caution about creating multiple >>> documentation baselines for OSGeo, (it creates a maintenance challenge) and >>> the recommendation of retasking the same material in multiple contexts. >>> >>> Cheers, Cameron >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5/8/17 9:34 am, Brian M Hamlin wrote: >>> >>>> HI Jody, All - >>>> >>>> In the past with OSGeo-Live, I have described the Mission Statement >>>> in three parts: >>>> >>>> Reference Install ; Showcase for Projects ; well-chosen (curated) >>>> examples >>>> >>>> WIth the release of Live 11 and the massive advance in Debian >>>> packaging, I believe the future is not one project. This can be seen as >>>> "evolution" .. it is natural for a large and mature project to split .. >>>> Website ; Server Edition ; Desktop Linux >>>> - >>>> with the new OSGeo web site development.. somehow I realized that the >>>> docs from OSGeo-Live should be the same docs in the new OSGeo web site. >>>> Rebuilding docs is too much work, and too many parts, to duplicate. >>>> Instead, >>>> build once and deploy in several contexts. - >>>> credit to Angelos Tzotsos and Debian Developer Sebastian Couwenburg >>>> The "server edition" of OSGeo-Live is simply UbuntuGIS PPA, >>>> with DebianGIS aka pkg-grass as the "upstream" in many cases.. - >>>> that leaves "desktop Linux" Ubuntu.. what remains of the OSGeo-Live. >>>> Critically speaking, it has been twenty years (or more) that I have been >>>> active, >>>> of promises of "desktop Linux" .. in fact, Windows and phones have >>>> spread, >>>> with some percentage of Mac OSX from Apple in various demographic >>>> groups. Web browsing is constant, phone use is constant and climbing, and >>>> .. no desktop >>>> revolution with Linux of any kind. OSGeo-Live right now, is basically >>>> desktop Linux. - >>>> Another note on Ubuntu.. as people likely know, the number one cloud >>>> VM instance >>>> is Ubuntu.. and last I heard, Google uses an Ubuntu fork for much >>>> within its cloud walls. The "server edition" of OSGeo-Live is.. Ubuntu >>>> packaging.. this bodes well.. - >>>> >>>> I am interested in participating in a BOF, but from my point of view, I >>>> think we should >>>> consider the OSGeo-Live 11 as somewhat an "end of an era" .. and move >>>> forward >>>> with eyes open to new, productive avenues for valuable efforts. >>>> best regards from Berkeley, California >>>> -Brian M Hamlin >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:41:07 -0700, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is anyone up for an OSGeo Live BOF: >>>> Also I finally uploaded photos with the OSGeo-Live team from foss4ge: >>>> (example|example|group). Could I ask the team to select one of these >>>> for a group photo for the new website? >>>> >>>> Had a productive meeting with the graphics designer about subbrands on >>>> wednesday - and had a good ideas for us to try out: rather than reuse the >>>> circle, reuse the small compass shape. Tried putting the compass shape in a >>>> computer logo and the result looked like what OSGeo-Live is. Also did one >>>> putting the heart in a computer frame as a reference. >>>> -- >>>> Jody Garnett >>>> >>>> ------------------------- >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Live-demo mailing list >>>> Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo >>>> http://live.osgeo.org >>>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Brian M Hamlin >>>> OSGeo California Chapter >>>> blog.light42.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Live-demo mailing list >>>> Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo >>>> http://live.osgeo.org >>>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cameron Shorter >>> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Live-demo mailing list >>> Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo >>> http://live.osgeo.org >>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) >> Salzmannstraße 44, >> 81739 München, Germany >> >> Vicky Vergara >> Operations Research >> >> eMail: vi...@georepublic.de >> Web: https://georepublic.info >> >> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 >> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 >> >> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 >> CEO: Daniel Kastl >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Live-demo mailing list >> Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo >> http://live.osgeo.org >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc >> > > -- Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Salzmannstraße 44, 81739 München, Germany Vicky Vergara Operations Research eMail: vi...@georepublic.de Web: https://georepublic.info Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 CEO: Daniel Kastl
_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
