Hi Angelos,
I agree. I've tweaked the wording such that a -1 vote from the community
results in referring to the PSC. I've left the PSC vote to be based on
majority votes. I'm anticipating that the PSC will have already been
involved in the community voting, and referring to the PSC will be rare.
Warm regards, Cameron
On 15/05/2016 9:28 pm, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
I am wondering if a -1 should be considered veto, at least for the
first round of voting.
I propose that the second round should be a majority vote.
On 05/15/2016 12:24 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
In order to align closer with OGeo-Live incubation principles, we
agreed on the last OSGeo-Live weekly meeting to document and
formalise our management in a Project Management Committee.
I've put together a draft here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Management
Comments welcomed.
I'm hoping to tweak wording, select the first PSC, and formalise
adoption at our next IRC meeting:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=5&day=20&hour=20&min=30&sec=0&p1=179&p2=189&p3=224&p4=22&p5=240&p6=196&p7=215
--
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
P +61 2 9009 5000, W www.lisasoft.com, F +61 2 9009 5099
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
