I agree with Johan, Snap is not a match for our case. Best, Angelos
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Johan Van de Wauw < [email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Brian M Hamlin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > I have two Xenial machines setup for the last month or so.. doing some > > experiments here and there.. > > > > One thing I did *not* see was the Ubuntu "Snap" packaging format [0].. > > > > > > > > well, this blog post [1] shows how Snap is a bad thing from a security > > point of view.. > > > > I suggest we stay away from Snap packaging.. more on packaging later.. > Since we are limited on space, snap is not really a good option as > libraries will be packaged several times (and possibly using more > memory at runtime). > > Kind Regards, > Johan > _______________________________________________ > Live-demo mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo > http://live.osgeo.org > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc -- Angelos Tzotsos, PhD OSGeo Charter Member http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
