Hi Jody,
Great to hear there is some activity happening with the CRS libraries.
But the question is not as to whether the projects are active, but rather whether there are people within the projects wishing to push these projects through the OSGeo Incubation process.

Rob, Martin, any thoughts from you?

I'd suggest we give people a week or 2 to respond, probably try and reach out directly as well, and if there are no takers, then we should gracefully have these projects step back from the OSGeo Incubation process, in order to better reflect the current OSGeo status of these projects.

Warm regards, Cameron

On 27/02/2016 9:10 am, Jody Garnett wrote:
Apaprently there is activity happening around the edges, I was talking with Rob and Martin about one of the metac crs projects.

MetaCRS is kind of a "top-level" project facilitating communication between a number of different groups. As such it may be able to recast itself as a "committee" (that has a shared github some of their initiatives).

I think MetaCRS would be a great candidate for an "OSGeo Technology" stream - the stated goal of MetaCRS is to:

    /"treat a variety of coordinate system activities as one Project
    from an OSGeo point of view. This helps provide enough "project
    mass" to justify the full OSGeo project treatment./


If we set up "OSGeo Technology" right these individual projects will meet their goal of being recognized as the fundamental components that they are (and be supported).

--
Jody Garnett

On 26 February 2016 at 11:55, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com <mailto:cameron.shor...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Hi MetaCRS and OSGeo Incubation people,
    Has there been any activity on the MetaCRS project [1] over the
    last few years? The last active ticket I see is from 2013.

    It is listed as one of the projects in OSGeo-Incubation, and I
    think has been in incubation from close to the start of OSGeo
    founding?

    Is anyone working on it? And in particular, does anyone doing any
    work on taking Meta-CRS through incubation?

    I'm wondering whether it should be retired from the incubation
    process, or maybe the scope of projects it is trying to incubate
    be reduced?

    I ask in part because we include a description of MetaCRS in
    OSGeo-Live, but have no point of contact to maintain documentation
    since Mike Adair has stepped back from OSGeo activities.

    [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/metacrs/

-- Cameron Shorter,
    Software and Data Solutions Manager
    LISAsoft
    Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
    26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

    P +61 2 9009 5000 <tel:%2B61%202%209009%205000>,  W
    www.lisasoft.com <http://www.lisasoft.com>,  F +61 2 9009 5099
    <tel:%2B61%202%209009%205099>

    _______________________________________________
    Incubator mailing list
    incuba...@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:incuba...@lists.osgeo.org>
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator



--
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099

_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Reply via email to