Hi all,
I definitely agree here with Howard.
Since Maptiler has been included in OSGeoLive for 5 years now, and Petr
has agreed to follow the OSGeoLive license for his contribution, there
has to be some kind of lineage about this project online. It cannot just
disappear. People would think that OSGeo endorced non-free software in
the past, which is not acceptable in my opinion.
We need an "official" public repository including the last version of
the open source code to link to. We should then link to that in our
documents (even if the project is removed). Cameron has already moved
the documents in the "retired" area.
I agree that the Maptiler name has to be removed from OSGeoLive in
future versions. But, the request for removal came much after our
official 8.5 code freeze, so I am against removing stuff from 8.5
especially 10 days before release.
I propose we keep the installer for 8.5 (unless Petr provides a new deb
version with a new name).
I also propose to remove the Maptiler documents completely for this release.
Then, as Johan suggested we can fork Maptiler as Icetiler for the next
OSGeoLive 9.0 release and restore the docs.
Best,
Angelos
PS. I also want to thank Petr for his work on Maptiler, it is much
appreciated.
On 02/09/2015 11:46 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
Hi all,
First of all I would like to thank Petr for his work on Maptiler. He
has actually spent a lot of unpaid time to develop a tool which is
useful for many users.
Earning a living from open-source is hard - as most people who have
tried will be able to tell you.
Second I would like to point out that a project that has many users
and little contributors is not necessarily unsuccessful. If your tool
is working well, it may not scratch a developers itch[1].
Anyway, it seems that by retiring from OsGeo live you did hit many
developers itch, so it seems this may actually be a rebirth of the
project.
I think that the request of Petr is fair: the code remains free (which
it should, because there can be many derived works), but he just
requests not to use the name and logo. This leaves room for other
developers to jump in and create a new version. Yesterday on IRC, I
proposed the name "IceTiler" as an alternative, based on the
rebranding done by debian for many mozilla projects [2]. Other
suggestions are welcome :-)
Taking all into account I'm +1 on removing this project from OsGeo
live in the current form, but I think we could have "IceTiler" in a
next release if there is sufficient interest.
Kind Regards,
Johan
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cathedral_and_the_Bazaar
[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation_software_rebranded_by_the_Debian_project
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
.
--
Angelos Tzotsos
Remote Sensing Laboratory
National Technical University of Athens
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
