After all, I remember that your script was there before, under beta
folder right?
On 08/04/2014 04:42 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
Hi Jachym,
Please commit you script in svn under bin folder.
When time comes I will link it in the main build script.
Thanks,
Angelos
On 08/04/2014 04:21 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
I have nothing against pushing it to next release, I understand, that
we are feature freeze phase right now
btw, shell I append the install script to svn/trunk already? any issue
with that? I can fix the script in svn afterwards ?
Jachym
2014-08-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Edwards, Ian <[email protected]>:
Hi Jachym,
There's a typo in your build script on line 67 [1]
wget -c
"https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/aaggrchive/pywps-3.2.2.tar.gz";
^^^^
If PyWPS is not essential for one of the FOSS4G workshop then it
would make sense to wait for OSGeo Live 8.5 for better testing.
Ian
[1] https://gist.github.com/jachym/0701ffcb8c7035476dd7
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Angelos Tzotsos
Sent: 04 August 2014 13:47
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Live-demo] pywps to osgeo-live
On 08/04/2014 01:50 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
I agree with Ian.
To avoid confusion I think we should perhaps update our overview and
split up web services [1]. Now it reads: "publishing spatial data to
the internet". That does not cover all services, nor is the list very
understandable.
I suggest split it up in data publishing services, metadata publishing
services, processing services and other services. With a short
explanation of what they mean with a reference to the pages describing
the standards that we already have [2].
I believe these standards pages also need some more care. I really
wonder if anyone who is not familiar can read those.
The user with little domain-specific knowledge should probably first
find out that what he really needs is a WPS service, and then have a
look at the different possibilities. In fact one could argue that we
could have a quickstart about consuming the services could be separate
from the quickstart for configuring services...
[1] http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/overview.html
[2] http://live.osgeo.org/en/standards/standards.html
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
.
I agree that PyWPS should be included in OSGeoLive in 8.5.
Having a better application to demonstrate its capabilities, or a
quickstart using QGIS WPS plugin would be a nice thing to have.
Same applies for Iris, a nice demonstration is what new users will
see first ;)
Best,
Angelos
--
Angelos Tzotsos
Remote Sensing Laboratory
National Technical University of Athens
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
--
Angelos Tzotsos
Remote Sensing Laboratory
National Technical University of Athens
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
