OK, now you guys have me curious…

I have a Netgate SG-2440 purchased directly from Netgate. I’ve received no 
emails. I don’t frequent the forums. But I am aware of an “alleged” chip issue, 
which I believe my unit is susceptible to.

Can someone provide a link to a relevant forum thread?

Thanks,
Richard


> On Mar 20, 2017, at 7:37 PM, Jon Gerdes <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I understand where you are coming from but I don't think the occasional
>  note from vendors of pfSense kit that covers issues with high
> importance (to users as well as vendors) could be classified as spam on
> the pfSense list. 
> 
> There are a lot of Netgate users here and Netgate gear has a bit of a
> focus, OS-wise.  
> 
> In this particular case the issue is not confined to Netgate gear and
> spelling it out here can't do any harm that I can foresee.  
> 
> You may prod users of other hardware platforms to investigate whether
> they they have the affected chips in their systems.  That can't be a
> bad thing provided the note is presented in a reasonably generic way
> but obviously you could mention specific products that you know are
> affected from your range or perhaps a short note pointing Netgate users
> to a URL for more info.
> 
> Cheers
> Jon
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 19:15 -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
>> I tend to be careful about spamming the pfSense list with things that
>> aren't directly related to pfSense.
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Jon Gerdes <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> It might be worth putting a press release style post here as well
>>> anyway.
>>> 
>>> Your mailing list may not be perfect and some people have a nasty
>>> habit
>>> of registering things with their own email address instead of a
>>> group
>>> address/alias and then moving on.  Thir account gets deleted and
>>> that
>>> box that does something for the internets stops working and it
>>> could
>>> have been fixed by a timely firmware update.
>>> 
>>> To be fair, there is quite a lot of chat on the forums about this
>>> and
>>> any interested pfSenser should be hanging out there as well as
>>> here.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 18:57 -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>> we only sent it to customers of affected units.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:43 PM, WebDawg <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Is there any other list for netgate firmware updates?  I just
>>>>> received a
>>>>> notification from sales@pfsense about netgate firmware updates
>>>>> but
>>>>> it was
>>>>> not sent to this list?
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> pfSense mailing list
>>>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pfSense mailing list
>>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pfSense mailing list
>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pfSense mailing list
>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> _______________________________________________
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to