> On Jan 26, 2017, at 5:06 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Am 2017-01-26 07:03, schrieb Jim Thompson: >> It does not. >> The c2758 SoC is interesting. 8 cores, and the on-die i354 is essentially a >> block with 4 i350s on it. >> These have 8 queues for each of rx and tx, so 16 each, for a total of 64 >> queues. >> On the c2xxx series (and other) boxes we ship, we increase certain >> tunables, because we know what we're installing onto, and can adjust that >> factory load. pfSense CE does not have that luxury, it has to run on nearly >> anything the community finds to run it on. Some of these systems have ... >> constrained RAM. While we test each release on every model we ship, such >> testing takes place only for a handful of other configurations. >> There is a decent explanation of some of the tunables here: >> https://wiki.freebsd.org/NetworkPerformanceTuning >> Incidentally, FreeBSD, and thus pfSense can't take much advantage of those >> multqueue NICs, because the forwarding path doesn't have the architure to >> advantage them. Our DPDK-based system can forward l3 frames at over 12Mpps >> on this hardware (about 80% of line-rate on a 10g interface). >> Neither pfSense or FreeBSD (nor Linux) will do 1/10th of this rate. > > > > > Hi, is this DPDK-based system commercially available? > > > > Rainer
Still being developed. Jim _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
