On 2015-07-23 21:24, Adam Thompson wrote:
On 2015-07-23 10:46 AM, Karl Fife wrote:
Your point about having a one-off solution is a great one. Installing a single UniFi AP would be unnecessarily complex.

The TP-Link TL-WA801nd is a BGN-only device. Do you (or anyone) have a preferred stand-alone AC access point?

Not a recommendation at all, but stay away from EnGenius devices. OK hardware & good price, but (e.g.) my AP comes with an open DNS resolver that can't be disabled, and they don't seem to think it's a problem at all...


I like the EnGenius hardware, when it works, but if it doesn't, support doesn't seem to care about much. I'm trying to map SSIDs to VLANs, the traffic just won't pass, switch doesn't even see it, and support hasn't be useful. Looks like a bug, but still, it's literally the reason I bought the device over my previous solution. On the other hand, the speed is amazing, so I'm not ripping it out.

I noticed the DNS resolver, but it didn't bother me personally as I have other resolvers similarly positioned in my network. As a possible workaround, does it need DNS at all? If not, either remove it's DNS settings, or configure your resolver to refuse packets. Not perfect, but it's better than being an open resolver if it's exposed to untrusted users. And for whatever it's worth, it looks like a non-caching forwarder, not a full resolver.

Still, it concerns me that support doesn't understand how it's a potential issue. If you use it for NAT/routing/anything, does it listen on the WAN interface, or only the LAN side?

--
Dave Warren
http://www.hireahit.com/
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren


_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to