On 03/31/2015 02:35 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
We have plans in this area, but they’re not ‘pfDNS’.
The pedant in me insists that should be "dnsSense", not "pfDNS".
Or even "bindSense" or "unboundSense", or... etc.
I'd rather you guys focused on improving the routing capabilities,
personally. (Like being able to run an IGP and an EGP on the same damn
box at the same damn time.) That already stops me from using pfSense in
multiple places today.
$0.02 per idea
-$0.02 goodwill discount
====
$0.00 net charge
-Adam
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
