> On Feb 27, 2015, at 10:21 AM, Chuck Mariotti <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I am starting this weekend to setup the same situation... So a simple 
> failover situation requires that we have TWO public IP addresses then?
> I am starting to second guess if it's smart to use a VLAN on a shared switch. 
> If it fails, then I have more problems at multiple levels vs. a simple dumb 
> switch.

Three, actually.  One for each interface and one shared CARP address.  It 
appears that using pfSense 2.2 you can use private addresses for the WAN 
interfaces and CARP hellos and a single, routable address for the shared CARP 
VIP but I don’t think ESF has approved that technique yet and if the public IPs 
are available that would be what I would do in production.

I can’t see a blank VLAN on a managed switch for your three WAN connections 
being any less reliable than a dumb switch and it would be tremendously more 
flexible (Think mirror ports and packet captures/monitoring on WAN, for 
instance.)

_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to