On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > > It isn't you or the binaries.
I also think it's the binaries. > The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a > while. Even prior to 2.2. I agree those are broken. However, I am unable to get the webui packages binaries to work. However, installing via pkg works fine, with the same configuration file. > > https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0 It was broken long before that. :) https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0 > > On 2015-02-09 11:57, Dan Langille wrote: >> Let me add my voice to the post at >> http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/2015-February/008038.html >> I was running daily backups prior to my upgrade to 2.2. >> pfSense creates a mangled configuration file. I filed a bug: >> https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307 >> Today, I managed to get bacula-fd running by manually creating >> /usr/local/etc/bacula and placing a valid bacula-fd.conf file in that >> directory. >> I am unable to get bacula-fd to authenticate. >> At this point, I'm beginning to suspect the bacula binaries. >> Installing and running via pkg succeeds with the same configuration >> file. >> Disclosure: I am a committer on the Bacula project and the FreeBSD >> maintainer for the Bacula ports. I'm not a Bacula novice, >> but I would like it if someone showed me what I am doing wrong. >> — >> Dan Langille >> http://langille.org/ >> _______________________________________________ >> pfSense mailing list >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
