OpenBGPd works quite well with CARP interfaces, actually... My primary
commercial IPv4 transit uses exactly that.
But that functionality might need a newer version of OpenBGPd than we have
right now... The package is getting a little long in the tooth.
-Adam
On January 8, 2015 9:23:10 AM CST, Seth Mos <[email protected]> wrote:
>Bryant Zimmerman schreef op 8-1-2015 om 15:28:
>> We are working on getting our own ASN with ARIN so we can get our own
>> blocks of address.
>> We are doing this because we are using multiple ISP's and want to
>> announce our own addresses, For better fail over.
>
>It's so much nicer then multi-wan, I don't regret it in the least.
>
>> We are currently using pfSense boxes with CARP at both our locations.
>> Will the open BGP package available for pfSense work correctly with
>--4
>> Byte ASN's
>
>Yes
>
>> --Does carp function correctly with Open BGP for fail over.
>
>You do not want to use CARP with with BGP in any situation. Each node
>needs it's own session with the remote BGP peer. You need to use iBGP
>between the nodes instead.
>
>Regards,
>
>Seth
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pfSense mailing list
>https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
