On Thu, December 5, 2013 07:22, Pedro Almeida wrote: > Hello Matheus, > > I have a problem with this model. My firewall in three days reboot alone > three times. In the > screen (ssh) always show this message: > "re0: watchdog timeout"
I dont have this. All I can see here is: re0: link state changed to DOWN re0: link state changed to UP re0: link state changed to DOWN re0: link state changed to UP re0: link state changed to DOWN re0: link state changed to UP re0: link state changed to DOWN re0: link state changed to UP re0: link state changed to DOWN re0: link state changed to UP re0: link state changed to DOWN re0: link state changed to UP that may reflect the switch power oscillation :) > I have two identical appliance, but tested only one. Today I changed the > appliance e during the > day i'll monitor to see if happen the problem again. I think I dealt with this nic on some other hardware. Not sure where now, may be on boxes I no longer have access to. > Are you Brazilian? yes :) > re0: <RealTek 8168/8111 B/C/CP/D/DP/E/F PCIe Gigabit Ethernet> port > 0xa800-0xa8ff mem > 0xfdbfb000-0xfdbfbfff,0xfdbfc000-0xfdbfffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 > re0: Using 1 MSI-X message > re0: Chip rev. 0x2c800000 > re0: MAC rev. 0x00000000 they look like relatives :) re0: <RealTek 8168/8111 B/C/CP/D/DP/E PCIe Gigabit Ethernet> port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xf0004000-0xf0004fff,0xf0000000-0xf0003fff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 re0: Using 1 MSI-X message re0: Chip rev. 0x2c000000 re0: MAC rev. 0x00000000 miibus0: <MII bus> on re0 rgephy0: <RTL8169S/8110S/8211 1000BASE-T media interface> PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX-flow-master, auto, auto-flow but mine seems older. att, matheus > Regards, > > > Pedro de Almeida > Jundia�-SP > Brazil > > > > > > > >> From: [email protected] >> Subject: List Digest, Vol 28, Issue 4 >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:00:01 -0500 >> >> Send List mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of List digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Who uses a Realtek RTL-8111 based nic without problems? >> (Nenhum_de_Nos) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:33:07 -0300 >> From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [pfSense] Who uses a Realtek RTL-8111 based nic without >> problems? >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 >> >> >> On Wed, December 4, 2013 11:57, Mathieu Simon wrote: >> > I have a Intel D510MO board (Atom D510) that I recently tossed 10.0-BETA3, >> > now BETA4 on >> > it. It seems this board has a the NIC you and others encounter issues with: >> > >> > re0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xd6158086 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x03 >> > hdr=0x00 >> > vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' >> > device = 'RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller' >> > class = network >> > subclass = ethernet >> >> hail, >> >> I have a similar, if not equal, model (mini itx atom intel board) >> >> re0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xd6258086 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x06 >> hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' >> device = 'RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> >> This is not pfSense, though. FreeBSD 9.0R, as home fileserver since April >> 2012. No issues so far >> I >> could say its the nic/nic-driver fault. >> >> att, >> >> matheus >> >> -- >> We will call you Cygnus, >> The God of balance you shall be >> >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> List mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> >> >> End of List Digest, Vol 28, Issue 4 >> *********************************** > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > -- We will call you Cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
