On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 09:11:08AM +0200, Thinker Rix wrote:

> Unfortunately the motherboards I plan to buy supports only the
> above-mentioned CPUs.

Anyone running pfSense on a HP Microserver G8?

http://b3n.org/installed-xeon-e3-1230v2-in-gen8-hp-microserver/

These are dual Broadcoms BCM5717 onboard, but you can stick a dual-port
Intel NIC in there as well.

> I have another thread going where I discuss motherboard compatiblity
> with pfSense. Should someone report, that finally I could also use
> the other of the two boards (the one with the 1150-socket and the
> C222 chipset), I could use different CPUs:
> - Pentium
> - 4th generation core i3
> - Xeon E3-1200 v3
> 
> In this case I could go for the i3, since it supports AES-NI.
> 
> But I do not expect that the C222 board will be compatible, so I
> most likely will have to stick with the CPUs mentioned above. Which
> one would you pick of those?
> 
> >If you look around online, you will find almost universal
> >agreement that AES-NI significantly improves VPN speed.  This also
> >means that even if you aren't maxing out the VPN's capacity, you
> >will still be saving processor cycles for doing the other stuff
> >that the machine needs to do.
> 
> There is this one thing I want to learn:
> AES NI helps lowering CPU load for encryption/decryption tasks,
> sure. But what happens if the CPU is not under full load? Will there
> still be an advantage then, i.e. because the CPU can perform the
> de/encryption *faster* when having AES NI support, so that the VPN
> latency might be reduced, so that e.g. VoIP-over-VPN would improve?
> Or is it the case that there is no difference, as long as the CPU is
> not under full load, because all that AES NI does, is allow the CPU
> to computer with less resources?
> 
> Thank you for your time!
> 
> Thinker Rix

> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to