On 24-4-2013 18:24, Chris Bagnall wrote: >> Some ISPs that are particularly stingy with IPs and bad at routing have >> been doing this. > > I might be missing something, but it does seem like a pretty awful, and > at best very temporary 'solution' to IPv4 shortage. > > I must admit if I were the OP, I'd probably be looking for a new DSL > provider. > > Roll on widespread v6 adoption and NAT64 for access to the 'legacy > internet' :-)
It looks like 464xlat is one of the better things that has come forth, however, it needs to be implemented on the client. Till that time, DNS64 and NAT64 will have to do. And it ain't pretty. Dual stack if you can folks! The water is fine! Cheers, Seth _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
