On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 4:03 PM, David Lawley <[email protected]> wrote: > thanks for the information, guessing things are different enough that > replace/reinstall will be best option. Guess there would always be that > doubt about any issue that would come up if it was an error in updating. >
Not really. Every install we have has been upgraded from 2.0x to 2.1. In general, 2.1 is in solid shape, and if it works it won't break. The risk at this point is that which is inherent in using an automatically built snapshot of any software, the builds aren't tested. The slowness issue is strictly with nano, full installs don't mount read only to read write. _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
