OpenBGP works. Its configuration is somewhat easier than the equivalent IOS or JunOS config, IMHO. Takes a while to get used to it. There are several people on this list running multiple full takes with it. I've only used it with ~300k routes. -Adam
Chris Bagnall <[email protected]> wrote: >On 1/7/12 4:47 pm, Eugen Leitl wrote: >> Are there any JunOS features you consider killer that >> are not in pfSense 2.1? What would be these features? > >'JunOS' is a fairly vague comparison point - the JunOS feature set >supported by the big Juniper routers is somewhat different from that >supported by the little SOHO firewalls. > >As a routing platform - the big difference (in my experience) has been >in BGP. Whilst pfSense does have an OpenBGP package, I've not heard too >many people using it in anger with full routing tables for considerable >traffic volumes (i.e. >1Gbps). By contrast, that's fairly standard for >all but the very bottom J-series boxes (and even the very bottom J2320 >will do 400Mbps). > >Actually, BGP on pfSense is an area I'd really like to learn more about >from people using it in anger - I can think of quite a few sites with >ageing J-series and Quagga boxes that I'd love to replace with pfSense >at some point - if pfSense proves appropriate. > >As a firewall I can't really comment - I've no real experience with the >smaller Juniper SOHO boxes. > >Kind regards, > >Chris >-- >This email is made from 100% recycled electrons > >_______________________________________________ >List mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
