On 02/19/2016 04:00 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 10:24 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> > On 02/18/2016 08:07 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> > > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 17:42 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> > > >>>> > > > This renames the global list which tracks all the virtual to physical >>>> > > > mapping and also the global list which tracks all the available >>>> > > > unused >>>> > > > vmemmap_hw_map node structures. >>> > > >>> > > But why? Why are the new names *so* much better that we would want to go >>> > > through all this churn? >> > >> > Hmm, okay. Its kind of subjective but then its upto you. > Yeah it is of course. I'm not saying your names aren't better, but they're not > obviously better to me, and so it's a lot of code churn for not much benefit > IMHO. > > But you can try and convince me if you really feel strongly about it.
Agreed, its not worth the churn. Thanks ! _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
