Hi Andrew,

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:04:35 -0800 Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> 
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 23:37:50 +0100 Christian Borntraeger 
> <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I pushed it on my tree for kbuild testing purposes some days ago. 
> > Will drop so that it can go via mm.  
> 
> There are other patches that I haven't merged because they were already
> in -next.  In fact I think I dropped them because they later popped up
> in -next.
> 
> Some or all of:
> 
> lib-spinlock_debugc-prevent-an-infinite-recursive-cycle-in-spin_dump.patch
> mm-provide-debug_pagealloc_enabled-without-config_debug_pagealloc.patch
> x86-query-dynamic-debug_pagealloc-setting.patch
> s390-query-dynamic-debug_pagealloc-setting.patch
> mm-provide-debug_pagealloc_enabled-without-config_debug_pagealloc.patch
> x86-query-dynamic-debug_pagealloc-setting.patch
> s390-query-dynamic-debug_pagealloc-setting.patch
> 
> So please resend everything which you think is needed.

Christian's tree will be empty in today's linux-next (I just refetched it).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to