On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:06:04PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> update numa_node of device associated with pci bus.
> moved down devm_kzalloc to allocate from node memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulka...@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> index 5434c90..0e1ce06 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> @@ -215,11 +215,9 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> - struct gen_pci *pci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL);
> + struct gen_pci *pci;
> struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
>
> - if (!pci)
> - return -ENOMEM;
>
> type = of_get_property(np, "device_type", NULL);
> if (!type || strcmp(type, "pci")) {
> @@ -230,6 +228,11 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> of_pci_check_probe_only();
>
> of_id = of_match_node(gen_pci_of_match, np);
> + set_dev_node(dev, of_node_to_nid(np));
I like the idea of this patch, but why do we need to call
set_dev_node() here in driver code? Shouldn't that be done by the
OF/platform device infrastructure so that all drivers for platform devices
get this benefit?
> + pci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pci)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> pci->cfg.ops = (struct gen_pci_cfg_bus_ops *)of_id->data;
> pci->host.dev.parent = dev;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pci->host.windows);
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
