On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 15:58 +0530, Anju T wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 9a7057e..c4ce60d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ config PPC
> select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 if PPC32
> select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
> select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
> + select HAVE_PERF_REGS
> select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
> select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT if PERF_EVENTS && PPC_BOOK3S_64
> select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d32581763
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
...
> +
> +u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64;
What is this value used for exactly?
It seems like on 32-bit kernels we should be returning PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32.
> +}
> +
> +void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
> + struct pt_regs *regs,
> + struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
> +{
> + regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> + regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
> +}
cheers
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
