On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 15:59 +1100, Stewart Smith wrote: > Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> writes: > > So my preference would be just an incremental patch ASAP to fix the kernel > > to > > do the right thing with the new interface. > > I see that's merged now, which is great! Even if someone is bisecting > back, things will be fine too.
Yep. And the bisection window is only 17 commits, so not a major problem in the end. I've added a check to my scripts so that when a patch touches opal-api.h it yells at me to check skiboot. Hopefully that will prevent this case in future. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
