On 13/01/16 17:10, Russell Currey wrote:
"p5ioc2 is used by approximately 2 machines in the world, and has never
ever been a supported configuration."
The code for p5ioc2 is essentially unused and complicates what is already
a very complicated codebase. Its removal is essentially a "free win" in
the effort to simplify the powernv PCI code.
In addition, support for p5ioc2 has been dropped from skiboot. There's no
reason to keep it around in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <rus...@russell.cc>
Doesn't apply cleanly on next, but that's minor.
@@ -117,11 +115,6 @@ struct pnv_phb {
union {
struct {
- struct iommu_table iommu_table;
- struct iommu_table_group table_group;
- } p5ioc2;
-
- struct {
/* Global bridge info */
unsigned int total_pe;
unsigned int reserved_pe;
Given this leaves struct ioda as the only member of the union, do we
want to get rid of the union?
--
Andrew Donnellan Software Engineer, OzLabs
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com Australia Development Lab, Canberra
+61 2 6201 8874 (work) IBM Australia Limited
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
