Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
+ regmap_write(regs, CCSR_SSI_SACNT,
+ ssi_private->regcache_sacnt);
So I'm not familiar with all of the regcache features, but I understand
this patch. I was wondering if it makes sense to write the same exact
value that was read previously. Isn't it possible for the WR or RD bits
to change between fsl_ssi_suspend() and fsl_ssi_resume()? That is,
should we be doing this instead?
u32 temp;
regmap_read(regs, CCSR_SSI_SACNT, &temp);
temp &= 0x18; // preserve WR and RD
regmap_write(regs, CCSR_SSI_SACNT, (ssi_private->regcache_sacnt & ~0x18)
| temp);
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
