On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 06:23:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 05:39:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 12:28:15PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu: > > > Can you please push at least the initial 3 patches of this for v4.4? > > > Wang Nan has posted v6 here: > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2110626 > > > So I tried it again today, from the v6, the latest patch with that > > subject line in my inbox, and I get this, after applying the first three > > patches: > > > [acme@zoo linux]$ make -C tools clean > /dev/null > > [acme@zoo linux]$ make -C tools/perf build-test > > make: Entering directory '/home/git/linux/tools/perf' > > Testing Makefile > > tests/make:15: /scripts/Makefile.arch: No such file or directory > > make[2]: *** No rule to make target '/scripts/Makefile.arch'. Stop. > > tests/make:5: recipe for target 'all' failed > > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > > Makefile:81: recipe for target 'build-test' failed > > make: *** [build-test] Error 2 > > make: Leaving directory '/home/git/linux/tools/perf' > > [acme@zoo linux]$ > > > Trying to figure this out... > > So, this doesn't seem to have been tessted, this part, specifically: > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/make b/tools/perf/tests/make > index 8ea3dffc5065..cd9c3ce1a5c2 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/tests/make > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/make > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ endif > else > PERF := . > > -include config/Makefile.arch > +include $(srctree)/scripts/Makefile.arch > > # FIXME looks like x86 is the only arch running tests ;-) > # we need some IS_(32/64) flag to make this generic > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Because $(srctree) is not set at that point, I copied the needed bits from > tools/perf/Makefile.perf and got the patch below, which makes:L > > make -C tools/perf build-test > > Work for me again. > > This should wrap up the day nicely, making me think of Jens Axboe recent > cool reaction to an untested patch: > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5661c2bc.9030...@kernel.dk > > :-) > > Jiri, are you ok with the patch below, on top of the second patch in > Wang's series, that you acked?
yep, looks good to me thanks, jirka _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
