On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 11:21 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > I've managed to construct .config files (for ppc64) that come across > this Kconfig warning: > > warning: (MPC836x_RDK && MTD_NAND_FSL_ELBC && MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM) selects > FSL_LBC which has unmet direct dependencies (FSL_SOC) > > Let's add the FSL_SOC dependency to the NAND drivers. AFAICT, they are > only supported on PPC32 FSL SoCs anyway.
There are other problems, if you can enable an 83xx board on ppc64. PPC_83xx does select FSL_SOC so I don't know why it's unmet. FWIW, I think we should instead drop the FSL_SOC dependency from FSL_LBC. It doesn't use anything that I can see from fsl_soc.c. It's been commonly abused as a means for hiding the option on builds for other platforms, but that has to stop anyway now that many of these devices are also on ARM-based chips. eLBC isn't, since it was obsoleted by IFC, but it shouldn't be unnecessarily different from IFC. IFC currently depends on FSL_SOC but that needs to go away. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
