On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:03:05 +1100 Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> > > Should I take this via powerpc or do you want it to go in via tracing? > > > > You can take it. And you can replace the PT_R1 if you want. I just > > noticed that it was defined, and I try to use macro names instead of > > hard coded numbers. I was actually looking for a "PT_SP" :-) > > OK thanks. > > Looks like we actually have: > > #define kernel_stack_pointer(regs) ((regs)->gpr[1]) > > So that would be the most self documenting way to do it I guess, though I've > never actually seen that macro used anywhere before :) Hi, Are you going to take this, or do you want me to? -- Steve _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
