Hi Daniel,
thank you for the links and the explanation.
On Dec 11 '15 19:13, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Thanks Valentin.
>
> Ironically I first noticed the spelling mistake in the original UBSAN
> patchset[1], but wanted it to work on powerpc straight away so I went
> with the mis-spelled version. It's since been corrected upstream[2]; and
> I was going to spin a v2 of my original patch with this fix, especially
> since I tagged the original patch as an RFC only. Regardless, thank you:
> this should keep -mm and next working in the mean time!
I haven't seen the fix, sorry for the noise then.
> > Fixes: 257e4ee82dbd ("powerpc: enable UBSAN support")
> Is this a SHA from linux-next?
Yes, it's Linux next. Retrospectively, that was a bad idea :(
Kind regards,
Valentin
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
