On Friday 04 December 2015 17:30:31 Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 06:13:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Yes, I think that would be best. Do you want me to send that patch, or do > > you prefer to do it yourself? In theory that patch should also go into > > stable > > kernels, but I suspect nobody who still owns a machine that is able to run > > this code will ever upgrade to a stable release, so we probably don't need > > that. > > Probably better if it goes through ppc tree - the only relationship it has > to VFS is broken calls of kill_fasync() in now-removed code...
Right. > Something like this, perhaps? > > [spufs] get rid of broken fasync stuff > > In all the years it's been in the tree it had never been used by > anything - it would instantly trigger BUG_ON() in fs/fcntl.c due > to bogus band argument passed to kill_fasync(). Since nobody > had ever used it in ten years, let's just rip it out and be > done with that. > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> > --- Looks all good, thanks! Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
