On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:14:59PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 11/05/2015 12:12 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>This renames traverse_pci_devices() to pci_traverse_device_nodes().
>
>Why? pci_traverse_device_nodes() is not moved to some more generic header
>where is would be required to have a standard prefix. And the ppc-pci.h
>header does not use any standard prefix so the point of renaming is unclear.
>
As the function is going to be exported, it's worthy to have a more generic
name.
>traverse_pci_dn() is still there and it has "traverse", "pci" and "device
>node" (abbreviated as "dn") in it so pci_traverse_device_nodes is more
>confusing name than traverse_pci_devices. Cannot we just get rid of one of
>them?
>
traverse_pci_dn() is traversing pdn (PCI_DN), not device nodes (struct
device_node).
>Also the subject line says "Export" but nothing gets exported in this patch -
>the visibility of pci_traverse_device_nodes() remains unchanged.
>
Yes, the EXPORT_SYMBOL() part is missed from this patch. I'll fix in next
revision.
>>The function traverses all subordinate device nodes of the specified
>>one. Also, below cleanup applied to the function. No logical changes
>>introduced.
>>
>> * Rename "pre" to "fn".
>> * Avoid assignment in if condition reported from checkpatch.pl.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h | 6 +++---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h
>>b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h
>>index ca0c5bf..8753e4e 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h
>>@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ extern struct pci_dev *isa_bridge_pcidev; /* may be NULL
>>if no ISA bus */
>> struct device_node;
>> struct pci_dn;
>>
>>-typedef void *(*traverse_func)(struct device_node *me, void *data);
>>-void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre,
>>- void *data);
>>+void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start,
>>+ void *(*fn)(struct device_node *, void *),
>>+ void *data);
>> void *traverse_pci_dn(struct pci_dn *root,
>> void *(*fn)(struct pci_dn *, void *),
>> void *data);
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>>index 7f877a4..aa4110f 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>>@@ -355,8 +355,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_remove_device_node_info);
>> * one of these nodes we also assume its siblings are non-pci for
>> * performance.
>> */
>>-void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre,
>>- void *data)
>>+void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start,
>>+ void *(*fn)(struct device_node *, void *),
>>+ void *data)
>> {
>> struct device_node *dn, *nextdn;
>> void *ret;
>>@@ -371,8 +372,11 @@ void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start,
>>traverse_func pre,
>> if (classp)
>> class = of_read_number(classp, 1);
>>
>>- if (pre && ((ret = pre(dn, data)) != NULL))
>>- return ret;
>>+ if (fn) {
>>+ ret = fn(dn, data);
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ return ret;
>>+ }
>>
>> /* If we are a PCI bridge, go down */
>> if (dn->child && ((class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI ||
>>@@ -470,7 +474,7 @@ void pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb)
>> }
>>
>> /* Update dn->phb ptrs for new phb and children devices */
>>- traverse_pci_devices(dn, add_pdn, phb);
>>+ pci_traverse_device_nodes(dn, add_pdn, phb);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
>>b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
>>index 272e9ec..543a638 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
>>@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int
>>request)
>> memset(&counts, 0, sizeof(struct msi_counts));
>>
>> /* Work out how many devices we have below this PE */
>>- traverse_pci_devices(pe_dn, count_non_bridge_devices, &counts);
>>+ pci_traverse_device_nodes(pe_dn, count_non_bridge_devices, &counts);
>>
>> if (counts.num_devices == 0) {
>> pr_err("rtas_msi: found 0 devices under PE for %s\n",
>>@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int
>>request)
>> /* else, we have some more calculating to do */
>> counts.requestor = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
>> counts.request = request;
>>- traverse_pci_devices(pe_dn, count_spare_msis, &counts);
>>+ pci_traverse_device_nodes(pe_dn, count_spare_msis, &counts);
>>
>> /* If the quota isn't an integer multiple of the total, we can
>> * use the remainder as spare MSIs for anyone that wants them. */
>>
Thanks,
Gavin
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
