On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:01:59PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 11/05/2015 12:12 AM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>As we track M32 segment consumption, this introduces an array to >>the PHB to track the mapping between M64 segment and PE number. >>The information is going to be used to find M64 segment from the >>PE number during PCI unplugging time in subsequent patches. > > >It would not hurt to put a few words about how we managed to live without >such a mapping for M64 before but we needed mapping for M32. >
The M32 mapping (phb->ioda.m32_segmap[]) isn't used for anything before this patcheset. There're no need for M64 mapping before this patchset similarly, no need to add the words. Thanks, Gavin _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
