Hi,
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> index b3a226b..3d7e537 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ struct pci_dn {
> #define IODA_INVALID_PE (-1)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
> int pe_number;
> + int vf_index; /* VF index in the PF */
Here, vf_index is inside CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV...
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> u16 vfs_expanded; /* number of VFs IOV BAR expanded */
> u16 num_vfs; /* number of VFs enabled*/
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
> index b3b4df9..f771130 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ struct pci_dn *pci_get_pdn(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn *parent,
> struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + int vf_index,
> int busno, int devfn)
> {
> struct pci_dn *pdn;
> @@ -157,6 +158,7 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn
> *parent,
> pdn->parent = parent;
> pdn->busno = busno;
> pdn->devfn = devfn;
> + pdn->vf_index = vf_index;
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
> pdn->pe_number = IODA_INVALID_PE;
... but here, vf_index is outside CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV.
Otherwise, the patch looks fine to me.
I'm still trying to get my head around SR-IOV generally - once I do I
will add any more comments I have or add a reviewed-by.
Regards,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
