Quoting Scott Wood (2015-10-09 16:57:44) > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 19:26 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > [Resending to updated e-mail address] > > > > On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 11:25 -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > > > Quoting Scott Wood (2015-06-18 19:49:10) > > > > The existing device tree bindings are error-prone and inflexible. > > > > Correct the mistake by moving the knowledge into the driver, which > > > > has more flexibility in describing the quirks of each chip. This leaves > > > > the device tree to its proper role of identifying a programming > > > > interface > > > > rather than describing its individual registers. > > > > > > Sorry for not responding to this one sooner. Fell through the cracks. > > > > > > All of the changes to drives/clk/clk-qoriq.c look great to me. I assume > > > you need to keep all of these patches together and want to the take > > > through the freescale tree? If so feel free to add, > > > > > > Acked-by: Michael Turquette <mturque...@baylibre.com> > > > > Is the ack still valid for the v3 patchset?
Yes. Looks Stephen beat me to it though. Regards, Mike > > ping > > -Scott > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
