On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 22:09 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 16/10/2015 12:02, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> > As the kbuild robot detected you have left an extra "}" here. > > > > I don't mind too much if you send patches that aren't compile tested, but > > you > > might save yourself some time by compiling them. > > Sorry about it, and thanks for your patience. > IMHO, this should never happen and patches should be at least > compile-tested. Preferably yes. But for these sort of cleanup patches, where you're touching lots of different arches, I realise it can be tedious to find all the various cross compilers. So I'm willing to cut you a bit of slack :) > I will be more careful and compile-test any new patch I submit. Thanks. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
