On 02/10/15 01:58, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
When running with an unsupported AFU, the cxlflash driver fails
the probe. When the driver is removed, the following Oops is
encountered on a show_interrupts() thread:
Call Trace:
[c000001fba5a7a10] [0000000000000003] 0x3 (unreliable)
[c000001fba5a7a60] [c00000000053dcf4] vsnprintf+0x204/0x4c0
[c000001fba5a7ae0] [c00000000030045c] seq_vprintf+0x5c/0xd0
[c000001fba5a7b20] [c00000000030051c] seq_printf+0x4c/0x60
[c000001fba5a7b50] [c00000000013e140] show_interrupts+0x370/0x4f0
[c000001fba5a7c10] [c0000000002ff898] seq_read+0xe8/0x530
[c000001fba5a7ca0] [c00000000035d5c0] proc_reg_read+0xb0/0x110
[c000001fba5a7cf0] [c0000000002ca74c] __vfs_read+0x6c/0x180
[c000001fba5a7d90] [c0000000002cb464] vfs_read+0xa4/0x1c0
[c000001fba5a7de0] [c0000000002cc51c] SyS_read+0x6c/0x110
[c000001fba5a7e30] [c000000000009204] system_call+0x38/0xb4
The Oops is due to not cleaning up correctly on the unsupported
AFU error path, leaving various allocated and registered resources.
In this case, interrupts are in a semi-allocated/registered state,
which the show_interrupts() thread attempts to use.
To fix, the cleanup logic in init_afu() is consolidated to error
gates at the bottom of the function and the appropriate goto is
added to each error path. As a mini side fix while refactoring
in this routine, the else statement following the AFU version
evaluation is eliminated as it is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mro...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com>
--
Andrew Donnellan Software Engineer, OzLabs
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com Australia Development Lab, Canberra
+61 2 6201 8874 (work) IBM Australia Limited
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
