On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 14:04 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Right, I did start with your advice and tried that approach, but it > turned out I was wrong about the actual issue at the time. The problem > for NVMe isn't actually the starting address alignment (which it can > handle not being aligned to the device's page size). It doesn't handle > (addr + len % dev_page_size != 0). That is, it's really a length > alignment issue. > > It seems incredibly device specific to have a an API into the DMA code > to request an end alignment -- no other device seems to have this > issue/design. If you think that's better, I can fiddle with that > instead. > > Sorry, I should have called this out better as an alternative > consideration.
Nah it's fine. Ok. Also adding the alignment requirement to the API would have been a much more complex patch since it would have had to be implemented for all archs. I think your current solution is fine. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
