On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:10:02AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
SNIP
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> index 885e8ac..6b8eb13 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ const struct sample_reg __weak sample_reg_masks[] = {
> SMPL_REG_END
> };
>
> +#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
> int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
> {
> int i, idx = 0;
> @@ -29,3 +30,4 @@ out:
> *valp = regs->cache_regs[id];
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> index 2984dcc..8dbdfeb 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> +#ifndef __maybe_unused
> +#define __maybe_unused __attribute__((unused))
> +#endif
> +
would the linux/compiler.h include do instead?
otherwise I'd be ok with this
thanks,
jirka
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
