-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <d...@axtens.net>
Regards,
Daniel
"Matthew R. Ochs" <mro...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Using sizeof(bool) is considered poor form for various reasons and
> sparse warns us of that. Correct by changing type from bool to u8.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mro...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manoj N. Kumar <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian King <brk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/cxlflash/superpipe.c | 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/cxlflash/superpipe.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/superpipe.c
> b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/superpipe.c
> index ffa68cc..28aa9d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/superpipe.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/superpipe.c
> @@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ static struct ctx_info *create_context(struct
> cxlflash_cfg *cfg,
> struct afu *afu = cfg->afu;
> struct ctx_info *ctxi = NULL;
> struct llun_info **lli = NULL;
> - bool *ws = NULL;
> + u8 *ws = NULL;
> struct sisl_rht_entry *rhte;
>
> ctxi = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctxi), GFP_KERNEL);
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/superpipe.h
> b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/superpipe.h
> index fffb179..72d53cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/superpipe.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/superpipe.h
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct ctx_info {
> u32 rht_out; /* Number of checked out RHT entries */
> u32 rht_perms; /* User-defined permissions for RHT entries */
> struct llun_info **rht_lun; /* Mapping of RHT entries to LUNs */
> - bool *rht_needs_ws; /* User-desired write-same function per RHTE */
> + u8 *rht_needs_ws; /* User-desired write-same function per RHTE */
>
> struct cxl_ioctl_start_work work;
> u64 ctxid;
> --
> 2.1.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=RI1B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
