On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 13:10 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> On 9/24/15, Michael Ellerman <mich...@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> > On 23 September 2015 16:05:02 GMT+10:00, Michael Neuling <mi...@neuling.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>Testcase tb.c (stolen from Anton)
> >> /* gcc -O2 tb.c -o tb */
> >> #include <sys/time.h>
> >> #include <stdio.h>
> >>
> >> int main()
> >> {
> >> int i;
> >>
> >> struct timeval tv_start, tv_end;
> >>
> >> gettimeofday(&tv_start, NULL);
> >>
> >> for(i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
> >> gettimeofday(&tv_end, NULL);
> >> }
> >>
> >> printf("time = %.6f\n", tv_end.tv_sec - tv_start.tv_sec +
> >>(tv_end.tv_usec - tv_start.tv_usec) * 1e-6);
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >
> > You know where test cases are supposed to go.
> >
> > I know it's not a pass/fail test, but it's still useful. If it's in the tree
> > it will get run as part of automated test runs and we will have a record of
> > the result over time.
>
> I can send a patch for it.
Mikey was working on it I think.
cheers
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
