On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:50:12PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 21:54 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > This could be a symptom and not the problem. What the above shows is > > that ftrace tried to convert the mcount at change_protection but what > > it expected was there wasn't. Unfortunately, it doesn't state exactly > > what it wants (that would take a arch specific function to do that, and > > this is in generic code). But what it found was "74 66 74 70", which I > > have no idea what type of command that is. > > This is big endian, so I think that's: > > andis. r6,r3,29808 > > Which is feasible.
It also says "tftp", which is intriguing if nothing else :-) Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
