On 19/08/15 02:23, Michael Neuling wrote:
So this doesn't break when you add a new state, is it worth writing it as:if (ctx->status >= STARTED) return -EBUSY; ?Yeah I think that would be more future proof, although it won't make a difference with the current code.
Sounds reasonable, I'll submit a V2. Andrew -- Andrew Donnellan Software Engineer, OzLabs andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com Australia Development Lab, Canberra +61 2 6201 8874 (work) IBM Australia Limited _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
