The paca display is already more than 24 lines, which can be problematic
if you have an old school 80x24 terminal, or more likely you are on a
virtual terminal which does not scroll for whatever reason.

We'd like to expand the paca display even more, so add a way to limit
the number of lines that are displayed.

This adds a third form of 'dp' which is 'dp # #', where the first number
is the cpu, and the second is the number of lines to display.

Example output:

  5:mon> dp 3 6
  paca for cpu 0x3 @ c00000000fe00c00:
   possible         = yes
   present          = yes
   online           = yes
   lock_token       = 0x8000                    (0xa)
   paca_index       = 0x3                       (0x8)
   kernel_toc       = 0xc000000001230300        (0x10)

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
---

v2: Honour the limit even for the initial lines, and change the
    implementation to use goto to bail out early rather than checking
    continuously.


 arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
index e599259d84fc..2950c6aface4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ Commands:\n\
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
   "\
   dp[#]        dump paca for current cpu, or cpu #\n\
+  dp##  dump paca for cpu #, only # lines\n\
   dpa  dump paca for all possible cpus\n"
 #endif
   "\
@@ -2070,9 +2071,10 @@ static void xmon_rawdump (unsigned long adrs, long ndump)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
-static void dump_one_paca(int cpu)
+static void dump_one_paca(int cpu, int num_lines)
 {
        struct paca_struct *p;
+       int line;
 
        if (setjmp(bus_error_jmp) != 0) {
                printf("*** Error dumping paca for cpu 0x%x!\n", cpu);
@@ -2082,17 +2084,28 @@ static void dump_one_paca(int cpu)
        catch_memory_errors = 1;
        sync();
 
+#define CHECK_LINE()                           \
+       if (num_lines && line++ >= num_lines)   \
+               goto out;                       \
+
+#define DUMP(paca, name, format)                                       \
+       printf(" %-*s = %#-*"format"\t(0x%lx)\n", 16, #name, 18,        \
+              paca->name, offsetof(struct paca_struct, name));         \
+       CHECK_LINE();
+
        p = &paca[cpu];
 
+       line = 0;
+
        printf("paca for cpu 0x%x @ %p:\n", cpu, p);
+       CHECK_LINE();
 
        printf(" %-*s = %s\n", 16, "possible", cpu_possible(cpu) ? "yes" : 
"no");
+       CHECK_LINE();
        printf(" %-*s = %s\n", 16, "present", cpu_present(cpu) ? "yes" : "no");
+       CHECK_LINE();
        printf(" %-*s = %s\n", 16, "online", cpu_online(cpu) ? "yes" : "no");
-
-#define DUMP(paca, name, format) \
-       printf(" %-*s = %#-*"format"\t(0x%lx)\n", 16, #name, 18, paca->name, \
-               offsetof(struct paca_struct, name));
+       CHECK_LINE();
 
        DUMP(p, lock_token, "x");
        DUMP(p, paca_index, "x");
@@ -2119,8 +2132,10 @@ static void dump_one_paca(int cpu)
        DUMP(p, irq_work_pending, "x");
        DUMP(p, nap_state_lost, "x");
 
+#undef CHECK_LINE
 #undef DUMP
 
+out:
        catch_memory_errors = 0;
        sync();
 }
@@ -2135,12 +2150,12 @@ static void dump_all_pacas(void)
        }
 
        for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
-               dump_one_paca(cpu);
+               dump_one_paca(cpu, 0);
 }
 
 static void dump_pacas(void)
 {
-       unsigned long num;
+       unsigned long num, lines;
        int c;
 
        c = inchar();
@@ -2151,10 +2166,13 @@ static void dump_pacas(void)
 
        termch = c;     /* Put c back, it wasn't 'a' */
 
-       if (scanhex(&num))
-               dump_one_paca(num);
-       else
-               dump_one_paca(xmon_owner);
+       num = xmon_owner;
+       scanhex(&num);
+
+       lines = 0;
+       scanhex(&lines);
+
+       dump_one_paca(num, lines);
 }
 #endif
 
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to